The Constipated Church

          Pride and Prejudice, a novel by Jane Austen, is a classic study in the haughtiness of man. In 1995 the British Broadcasting Company (BBC) created a miniseries from the book that starred Colin Firth and Jennifer Ehle. In one scene Mr. Bingley confronts his friend, Mr. Darcy, about seeing Jane Bennet in London and unabashedly asks, “You tell me now that she was in London all those months, and you concealed it from me?” Darcy’s reply, “Yes; I can offer no justification. It was an arrogant presumption based on a failure to recognize your true feelings. And Miss Bennet's!”
Arrogant presumption is an issue in some churches because leadership thinks too highly of what their church is and fails to recognize what Christ wants for the congregation. They assume they are a strong and influential church when in reality they are constipated – that is, so full of their history that they bloat their own importance. They reside in the past, resting on ancient laurels rather than being steadfast in the present for what God desires them to be now.
            I was once told by a pastor that his church was a leadership church. He and a few of his supporting elders prided themselves on the fact that their church formed many ministries and was highly influential in the area. I thought to myself, “What is a leadership church? Does it mean that it is setting a trend that other churches quickly follow? Or does it mean that the church was so progressive that other churches looked toward it for direction?” Although I believed the church had many fine qualities, it was far from a “leadership church.” In fact, the leadership was conflicted in vision and direction; and really didn’t have a pulse on the true needs of the sheep that had started wandering to other pastures. In other words, the church was in decline some five or six years after its high point and leadership refused to recognize it.
            Constipation makes us concentrate on “me” and when we do, we forget that the church is not ours, but Christ’s. How soon we forget that the church is an assembly of professing Christians who come together to worship Christ, obey his word, and promote his gospel (Rom. 16:5; Col. 4:15)! As a people of Christ, we are the body of the redeemed, for we are part of all the elect given to Christ by the Father (John 10:29). The Church belongs to Christ, for he is the Good Shepherd who surrendered his life for the sheep (John 10:11). And if the Church is Christ’s, then leadership must get off their high horse and submit to the lordship of Jesus, for he is the head of the Church (Eph. 5:23).
            When leadership fails to see the stages of decline in their church, they actually participate in its downfall. For the most part, they wear rose colored glasses and see a wonderful church, a family church, and an active church. But like the person who has cancer growing on the inside of his body and yet seems very healthy at the moment, the local church may seem fine but internally a disease is eating away and will eventually surface causing debilitation and possible death. That disease is for the most part “failed leadership.” Leaders are to see through the lens of Scripture and rule the local church as appointed by Christ.

The Church at Laodicea
            The Church at Laodicea is an example of the constipated church. They were rich in material goods and so wealthy they had need of nothing, but spiritually were wretched, poor, and blind (Rev. 3:17). Laodicea was a prosperous banking center; so, proud of its wealth that it refused Roman disaster relief after the earthquake of A.D. 60, and was therefore rebuilt from its own resources. It was also known for its textiles (especially wool), for its medical school, for its production of ear medicine as well as the highly reputed Phrygian eye salve.
The church though wealthy became complacent in the spread of the gospel. They thought they needed nothing and didn’t realize that their spiritual condition was one of misery and poverty. Whatever we have as individuals or as a church really belongs to the Lord. What we do with it belongs to us. The problem is that we have the tendency to hoard our capital and keep it for a rainy day. Ironically, being a wealthy church may be a deterrent to spreading the true gospel, for it keeps our focus on the earthly rather than the heavenly. For instance, during the 1980’s there was the push toward the mega church. Bigger churches had the money, the people, the programs, and the reputation. They concentrated on technique and expansion and acted like the gurus of the “here and now” church growth movement. Pastors of some smaller churches became envious of those who had huge churches. They too became constipated because of their worldly desires enticing them to be bigger and greater. But money can’t buy love, particularly the love of Christ. In fact, riches could easily be detrimental to spiritual growth, especially if we claim the Lord blessed us with it, but do nothing for the enhancement of the kingdom on earth.
When we don’t grow spiritually, we become lukewarm just like the Laodiceans. Christ knew their deeds like he knows ours. They were neither cold nor hot, for either condition would have been pleasing to the Lord (Rev. 3:15). Laodicea was located on the Lycus River in the same province with Hierapolis and Colossae. Hierapolis was where hot springs were located to the north above Laodicea. Colossae was located to the south, but at higher elevation than Laodicea; it had fresh pure water that flowed from it. The hot water from Hierapolis met the cold water from Colossae at Laodicea on the Lycus River; and there the mixture became lukewarm.
To be hot would be like hot springs, acting as healing waters to those who were hurting. To be cold would be like bringing cool refreshment to people in need of encouragement. Jesus commended either condition, but to be lukewarm meant that the Laodiceans were tepid in their spiritual life and thought more highly of themselves than they should have. So, because they were neither hot – acting as healing balm – nor cold – spreading the refreshing taste of the gospel – Jesus would spew them from his sight (Rev. 3:16).
            There are many Laodicean churches today. They stand on their past record and continue to be rich through the legacies left by appreciating donors or by money bestowed by present influential people. I have known a few churches that had magnificent edifices and little financial worries. They lived on their past reputations and maintained that they were still relevant in their community. The honest truth was that they were blinded by their own ignorance, inflated with their own self-importance, and had ceased being relevant years before.

Memorial Day Thoughts


We recently celebrated Memorial Day, which is a day of remembrance – of those who gave their lives in their nation’s service. Originally called Devotion Day, then Decoration Day, Memorial Day was officially proclaimed on 5 May 1868 by General John Logan, national commander of the Grand Army of the Republic. The first observance was on 30 May 1868, when flowers were placed on the graves of Union and Confederate soldiers at Arlington National Cemetery.

In 1915, inspired by the poem "In Flanders Fields," Moina Michael replied with her own poem:
We cherish too, the Poppy red
That grows on fields where valor led,
It seems to signal to the skies
That blood of heroes never dies.

She then conceived of an idea to wear red poppies on Memorial Day in honor of those who died serving in the military during wartime. She was the first to wear a homemade poppy, sold some to her friends and co-workers, and gave the money to benefit servicemen in need. Shortly before Memorial Day in 1922 the VFW became the first veterans' organization to sell poppies throughout the nation.

Traditional observance of Memorial Day has sadly diminished over the years. Many Americans nowadays have forgotten the meaning and traditions of Memorial Day. At many cemeteries, the graves of the fallen are increasingly ignored and neglected. While there are towns and cities that still hold Memorial Day parades, many have not held a parade in decades. Some people think the day is for honoring any and all dead, and not just those fallen in service to our country.

The younger generation view Memorial Day as a marker in their calendar - just another holiday to take off and enjoy. I’m a marine. I fought in Vietnam. When I first visited the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in D.C., I touched that wall of 50,000 service men and women and could not help but weep. I survived by the grace of God, but some of my men did not. To tread upon the day in making it just another holiday pains me.

As a combat veteran, it grieves me to see the waning of this holiday, for now we celebrate the day has a “happy picnic day”; not a remembrance. In Scripture we are told about remembrance – to remember the great acts of God. The Israelites would leave huge stones to commemorate a deliverance from God or one of His miracles that demonstrated His power and protection. Christ, at the Last Supper, told us to eat the bread and drink the wine in remembrance of Him, proclaiming His death until he comes again.

Hopefully, we Americans will never forget the lives of those that died in service to our country. I pray that Memorial Day brings to mind the great act of Christ who gave His life that we may live eternally! God bless!

Synod Court Desires Unity over Purity of the Gospel


The Layman Online (May 22, 2012) reported by a vote of 125 to 51 that the Presbytery of Los Ranchos of the PCUSA adopted the following resolution: The Presbytery …affirms that the Bible, The Book of Confessions and the Book of Order...set forth the Scriptural and constitutional standards for ordination and installation. Los Ranchos Presbytery believes the manner of life of ordained ministers should be a demonstration of the Christian gospel in the church and in the world, including living either in fidelity within the covenant of marriage between a man and a woman or chastity in singleness and will so notify candidates for ordination/installation and/or membership in the presbytery….

This vote was complained to the Synod of Southern California and Hawaii Permanent Judicial Commission, which was heard on May 4, 2012. It’s ruling, without sustaining the complainants’ specifications of error, admonished the presbytery for its adoption of the resolution that would potentially harm the peace and unity of the church. The court’s decision was as follows: The decision affirms that "the presbytery's resolution is a proper exercise of the powers that are reserved to presbyteries (F-3.0209). It is the presbytery's duty to bear witness to error in doctrine and immorality in practice within its bounds (G-3.0301c)."

After affirming the presbytery's constitutional right and even responsibility to exercise such oversight of its members and candidates, the court further ordered … that the Presbytery of Los Ranchos be admonished that while this PJC considers the resolution constitutional, the use of specific language known to be divisive and inflammatory flies in the face of the responsibility to seek the peace, unity and purity of the church.

Evidently, peace and unity are considered superior values than truth and purity of the Word. No wonder people and churches are leaving the PCUSA denomination. Such decisions mock those who lost their lives for truth during the Reformation. If the synod’s court had its way, there would have been no Reformation, for such a movement flew in the face of peace and unity. Romans 12:18 does admonish us to be at peace with all men if it is within our power to do so. Yet peace must not be at all costs when the purity of the gospel is at stake. If the sum of God’s Word is truth (Psalm 119:160), should we not promote it? In fact, those who do not promote truth actually deceive their neighbor (Jer. 9:5) and do not know God (Jer. 9:3). John says that “he who practices the truth comes to the Light, so that his deeds may be manifested as having been wrought in God” (John 3:2). Jesus equated those who abide in His Word as true disciples (John 8:31). Furthermore, Jesus did not come to bring peace and unity as the world or the PCUSA desires. He came with a sword that would divide people over the truth (Luke 12:51).

Not liking directives of God’s word leads people to follow their own sensuality, which leads to maligning truth (2 Pet. 2:2). This has certainly been the case in denominations that have a low view of Scripture and believe cultural redefinitions are more important that scriptural admonitions. For a synod court to say the Presbytery had the power to rule on error and to determine what is immoral within its bounds and then in the same breath admonish them for breaching the peace and unity of the church is a decision bordering on schizophrenia, for this court cannot tell right from wrong, real from unreal, and cannot logically see that the purity of truth is to be defended over and above co-existence with error and immorality.

Interim Ministry and the Marine Corps

As a Marine officer in Vietnam, I have experienced war, seen death, and grieved over the loss of men. I don't wish combat on anyone, but greater battles are in the spiritual realm, for the fight for "soul survival" is constant and will continue until the appearance of Christ. It is also more fearful than physical combat, for Jesus said not to be afraid of those who kill the body, but fear the One who could cast the soul into hell.[1] The battle rages, for Satan loves to disrupt Christian ministry by poking his nose into the affairs of churches. Although he cannot destroy the soul that belongs to Christ, he certainly can make believers ineffective witnesses for the kingdom. He therefore establishes a foothold in the church, breeds conflict, and destroys unity.

The job of an interim pastor is very much like the objectives of a Marine battalion taking a beachhead. The Marines are landed on the shore by the Navy, sometimes under heavy gunfire by the enemy. They endure the incoming barrage of artillery fire and persevere through mine fields in order to secure the beachhead for the Army who will occupy it. In church work, the interim pastor prepares the beachhead (i.e., the church), takes the flak (i.e., the criticism from opposition), and perseveres the mine fields (i.e., plods through the issues and conflict) in order for the Army (the new Senior Pastor) to occupy the beachhead. Interims are to make the job easier for the new pastor by redeeming any conflict to the glory of God, by training elders in the way of Scripture, by managing church staff for unity and effectiveness, and by tending the sheep so that they can be easily cared for by the new pastor.

Standing in the gap for another pastor is a high calling. An interim pastor is a special breed of marine, for he has to love and fight for people that he will eventually leave in the hands of another. His orders are from the Lord; his objective clear – make ready the congregation for the new shepherd. He is to confront the obstacles, reconcile the conflict, and bring peace to the congregation so that the ministry of the new pastor will start out on the right foot without having to deal with problematic people or consuming issues.

True interim pastors are transitional shepherds who are not candidates for the vacant position of senior pastor.[2] An interim will become beloved by many in the congregation who will want him to stay on, but he must make it abundantly clear that his task is to prepare the church for a new man. Those who waffle and say they will be a candidate cause further conflict in the church and put the pastoral search committee in a difficult situation. Although he is to be enthusiastic in his ministry, he must be subservient to his objective. Once a new man is selected for the church, the interim must decrease and the new man elevated in the remaining time the interim has to serve.


[1] Luke 12:4-5

[2] An interim pastor should have a clause in their contract that states he is not nor will be a candidate for the vacant position of Senior Pastor. See the Appendix A2 for a sample of an Interim Pastor’s contract.

The Ailing Church

Statistics do not lie; and what they tell us about the Church is that God’s ecclesia is ailing and in need of doctoring. The Hartford Institute for Religion Research claims that 59% of all Protestant churches average between 7 and 99 attendees and 35% average between 100 and 499.[1] Size, however, doesn’t matter when it comes to controversy, for the American Congregations Study of 2008 reported that conflict held steady from 2000 to 2008 in that approximately 75% of all churches had conflict within the previous five years over matters of money, worship, and leadership.[2]

Conflict invariably leads to disgruntled people who either leave the church or withhold their giving, resulting in ineffective ministry and damaging church vibrancy. Ed Stetzer, in his book, Planting New Churches in a Postmodern Age,[3] claims that 80 % of North American churches are stagnant or declining. This is the same statistic found in Harry Reeder’s book, From Embers to a Flame[4] when he quotes from Win Arn’s The Pastor’s Manual for Effective Ministry.[5] Dr. Reeder lists a number of indicators that represent a church in decline to include falling attendance, drop in giving, living in the past, reliance on dominant personalities, a mentality of maintenance in keeping the status quo, a bad reputation in the community, and the lack of gospel centrality.

Most ailing churches, however, do not believe they are in decline. Leaders have a difficult time hearing that they lead dead or dying churches, for it is a reflection on their leadership. But such a mentality proves my point. The problem in the church, the main disease that depletes its energy and vitality, is failed leadership. Many leaders refuse to face the facts and so their churches will remain ineffective in promoting the gospel of Christ. Rather than look at themselves and ask what God would have them do in promoting the gospel and shepherding his flock, they remain tied to the past by refusing to repent of their negligence or malfeasance and humbling themselves to seek help and direction. They contribute to church stagnation by not nourishing the sheep and asking a “doctor” to make a house call. They refuse to seek counsel with those who understand the dynamics of the church, for they might not like the “doctor’s diagnosis.” Even more so, they might not like the “doctor’s opinion,” which could include radical surgery to root out the cancerous disease affecting God’s sheep. And so they mask the symptoms and rationalize that the problems were caused by events or people outside of their control.

[1] Hartford Institute for Religion Research, Hartford Seminary website (© 2000 – 2006) quoting the National Congregations Study of 2009 done by Duke University.

[2] Hartford Institute for Religion Research, quoting from their American Congregations Report of 2008.

[3] Ed Stetzer, Planting New Churches in a Postmodern Age (Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 2003), 10.

[4] Harry L. Reeder, III, From Embers to a Flame; How God Can Revitalize Your Church (Phillipsburg, NJ: P & R Publishing Co, 2008), 7.

[5] Win Arn, The Pastor’s Manual for Effective Ministry (Monrovia, CA: Church Growth, Inc., 1988), 16.

A Palladin is Worth his Hire

Paladin, Palidin, where do you roam?

Paladin, Palidin, far, far from home.[1]

A paladin was a knight known for heroism and chivalry. The idea of a knight in the frontier West called Paladin was the creation of Sam Rolfe and Herb Meadow, which became one of the top five TV shows in the 1950s. In the first verse of the theme song, which also became a hit single, Paladin was described as a “knight without armor in a savage land.” On the surface, the black clad Paladin was just a high-priced gun-for-hire, but in reality he was a dapper and sophisticated private lawman-for-hire.

His business card read, “Have Gun, Will Travel.” The calling card of an interim pastor should read, “Have Guts, Will Travel.” He too is God’s knight without physical armor sent to various lands to settle disputes and correct wrongs. Like Paladin, the interim is a literate, moral, and courageous man.

Although interim pastors are willing to travel and make house calls, in many cases church leadership considers them too expensive. Money frequently seems to be a problem when a church loses its pastor, especially due to conflict. People, discontented with the old pastor or the present leadership, normally withhold their tithes as a sign of displeasure; some leave the church all together. Hiring an interim is seen as an obstacle to saving funds for the new pastor’s salary and benefit package. And if the old pastor was given a severance, finances become even more of an issue.

Such thinking is wrong, for money should not drive ministry. In fact, money follows ministry and resources are the result of relationships. An interim pastor provides the oversight needed in a hurting church; and his presence normally stops the depletion of funds by solidifying the base and unifying the congregation. When leadership allows finances to defer the need for a paladin, then they demonstrate a low concern for the sheep and allow mammon to control the direction of the church. They also foolishly convince themselves that the church is not that sick; that their struggles are like a winter cold, which will soon go away. Paying a paladin (i.e., a doctor making a house call) is thought too expensive and homeopathic remedies will be applied to the detriment of the health of the congregation.

Jesus said that we cannot serve God and mammon;[2] and God desires shepherds for his sheep, for woe to them who leave the flock unprotected.[3] As Jesus felt compassion for the distressed and downcast, like sheep without a shepherd,[4] leaders should be immediately concerned that their sheep have no lead pastor to tend to their fitness. Refusal to hire a paladin to protect the flock because finances are low and savings must be garnered for the new pastor makes mammon the determining factor in the care of anxious and distraught sheep.

Such a decision does not bode well for the health of the church, for a flock without the lead shepherd will wander and that scattering is laid on the heads of the elders.[5] When the flock is dispersed as a result of conflict or otherwise, they may become prey to others because of a lack of protection. In other words, they may end up sitting under false teachers and absorbing bad doctrine. And when elders do not seek to find them and bring reconciliation to the flock, they will be judged by the Lord.[6] Protecting the sheep is too important to allow the passage of time and the worries of money prevent the hiring of a palladin to shepherd the flock and care for the immediate needs of sheep.


[1] Ballad of Paladin, written by Johnny Western, Richard Boone, & Sam Rolfe; sung by Johnny Western for the TV show, Have Gun Will Travel, which ran from 1957 – 1963 on CBS.

[2] Matthew 6:24

[3] Zechariah 11:17

[4] Matthew 9:36

[5] Jeremiah 23:1

[6] Ezekiel 34:7-11

Is there a Doctor in the House?

A doctor was awakened at 4:00AM by a caller who wanted to know how much he charged for a house call. In a sleepy voice, the doctor said, “$200.00.”

“Umm, that seems a bit high,” replied the caller. “How much do you charge for an office visit?”

“$75.00,” came the muffled and somewhat irritated answer.

“That sounds fine,” said the inquisitive caller. “I`ll meet you at your office in 20 minutes.”

Not too many physicians make house calls anymore. The country doctor who knew his patients and who would fight snow storms to care for them in their home seems to be a fading apparition in our society. Dedication is not the problem, for most doctors are very dedicated to their calling and to their patients. Times have changed, however, and the health care system has evolved so dramatically that house calls are now unnecessary. With specialized health care personnel available at a much lower cost than a physician it is more practical to have visiting nurses and hospice care. Furthermore, making house calls would not be financially feasible for doctors when they can see so many more patients in their office during the day.

In the church-at-large there are still general practitioners that make house calls. These are the people who consult with churches about vision and mission, who spend hours with leadership and congregations in resolving conflict, and who readily uproot themselves to pastor a church for a season. One such church doctor is the dedicated interim pastor who relocates to the neighborhood of the church, consults with leaders, shepherds the flock, manages the staff, and prepares the congregation for the arrival of the new senior pastor.

When a church is without a senior pastor, a gap occurs in leadership, vision, and shepherding the flock. Many churches believe that they can fill the void with their present staff, hiring pulpit supply for each Sunday, or having elders preach. What leadership fails to realize is that the problems they had with the old pastor, the lack of vision they have unknowingly encouraged, or the mismanagement of staff is still present! A new minister will be confronted with the issues, seeds of discontent, and any other problem not solved or healed in the past. His ministry will, therefore, start with a precarious step, for lurking behind the smiles and gratitude of his coming remains the problems that caused the demise of the prior pastor or contributed to his leaving for a new call.

The true interim pastor is not only a shepherd, but also a church doctor who displaces himself to establish his clinic with a new church. He doesn’t just fly in on weekends and meet with leaders and then preach a Sunday sermon. On the contrary, he is a man who lives with the sheep on a daily basis, binds up their wounds, brings resolution to personal and family concerns, and feeds them the gospel. As acting senior pastor, the interim will grow to know and love the sheep, which in turn will make his preaching more relevant to their needs.

A dedicated interim pastor is not just a weekend pulpit supply person. Although different preachers will expose the congregation to a multitude of preaching styles and pulpit personalities, they will not normally endear themselves to the sheep for lack of attachment nor will they understand the depth of the problems and seriousness of the hurt in a conflicted congregation. Weekend warriors, as good as they may be, will normally preach from texts they have previously delivered to other congregations, which may or may not be relevant to the disaffected congregation. This hardly provides cohesiveness from Sunday to Sunday. Although a church should seriously think about calling a church doctor and employing an intentional interim pastor when the prior pastor leaves for any reason, there are some special situations in which an interim should be called without question. So, what are the occasions that would be appropriate to hire a committed interim pastor?

First, if the church has experienced major conflict and the senior pastor has resigned, then an interim should be employed by the leadership on behalf of the congregation. According to Life Line for Pastors, 1500 pastors per month leave their pulpits.[1] Another 50% of pastors said that they would leave the ministry if they had viable alternatives. The main reason recited by departing and frustrated pastors was the difficulty in dealing with problem people and dissatisfied leaders. An interim pastor, who is an unbiased church health specialist, has no “dog in the fight” (i.e., he takes no side and has no personal interest in the outcome). As an objective outsider, he will deal with the conflict biblically, attempt to bring peace to the congregation, and lead warring factions to reconcile or leave the church. This needs to be accomplished so that the new man is not faced with a split congregation and then have to deal with the conflict himself. His ministry is to start afresh and not be burdened with discontented sheep that are butting heads among themselves.

A second reason to call an interim minister is when a well-loved pastor has suddenly died or has become incapacitated because of illness. A buffer zone is needed for the congregation to process the sudden departure before accepting another pastor. Hiring a new pastor too soon will not allow the congregation to grieve their loss. To engage a new man without the intervention of an interim may be setting him up as a “sacrificial lamb.” In other words, the new pastor will normally be opposite in some way to the beloved pastor, which causes disappointment in many people. If the congregation cannot be unified because of preconceived ideas of what the pastor should be and look like, then the new man becomes an unintended interim and struggles for a couple years before he resigns. A qualified interim will not only help the grieving process, but will aid the church in finding a pastor with the personality and characteristics that will fit the persona of the church.

A third reason for the need of an interim is when there has been moral failure of the previous pastor. The congregation will be hurting – some in shock; some very angry; and others quickly forgiving, which causes consternation from those not so understanding. Much effort will be needed to soothe the pain and to bring reconciliation among the flock. The interim pastor is better equipped at doing this since he will involve himself in the healing process to include confrontation when necessary. A new senior pastor should not have to expend his energy in counseling members because of a former pastor’s indiscretions. He needs to ease his way into leading the sheep and have a honeymoon period with the congregation.

A fourth reason for employing an interim pastor is when the previous pastor has been asked to leave. It is not because he had moral failure, but because he and the leadership have continually disagreed with the direction of the church. The leadership normally splits into two groups – those who support the pastor and those opposed. Eventually, the opposition becomes the majority, has the ear of the congregation, and makes it difficult for the pastor to continue his ministry. The pastor fights back with the outcome splitting the leadership and causing schism in the congregation. Peacemaker Ministries or similar conciliation services may have been consulted and retained to resolve the conflict and in so doing may have advised the pastor to resign, even after reconciliation, for the good of the church. In such cases, an interim pastor should be brought in to continue the reconciliation process and help the church ease into a new era.

The fifth reason to have an interim pastor is when a beloved senior pastor (known as a legacy pastor) has retired after a long tenure.[2] An interim, because of his experience with different types and styles of churches, can help a pulpit committee hone in on the traits needed in a new senior pastor. To prevent the sacrificial lamb syndrome described in the second reason above, a period of time is needed to transition from the old to the new pastor. In such instances, it may be wise to hire the interim a couple of months before the actual retiring date of the old pastor. This may simplify the transition process, making it more painless for the sheep to accept and adapt to the change that is unavoidable.



[1] Life-Line For Pastors is a publication of Maranatha Life (P.O. Box 1206, Donna, TX 78537) http://www.MaranathaLife.com

7 Length of time at a church will vary, but normally any pastor that has served over 10 years has left a mark that makes it difficult for his replacement to reach. In other words, his legacy will invariably cause comparisons to the new pastor’s ministry, making it difficult for the new man to live up to expectations, which may have been unwittingly imposed on him.

Testimony of a Recovering Lawyer

I love the Church, but shutter over her ineffectiveness in reaching the culture with the gospel. God called me into ministry, not by some gentle prodding, but by slapping me into reality. I was on my way to hell; my family was falling apart; and my vocation as a lawyer was unrewarding. Growing up a Roman Catholic, I had become an atheist by studying philosophy and comparative religions at a Catholic university. It wasn’t until my Jewish wife discovered Christ at an outreach dinner party that I revisited Christianity, mainly to refute and silence her witness. Unable to shake her faith, I discovered the irony of God, for the more I studied to gain evidence to counter the claims of Christ, I became more enamored with the person called Jesus. Accepting the reality of his existence, I was confronted with the choice of Jesus as lunatic for claiming to be God or as Lord because that was the only other alternative. He could not have been a wonderful teacher because the assertions he made would have categorized him as a charlatan and liar. I realized that if Jesus was Lord and God I would have to submit to his governance and do what he required of his servants. This was a struggle for a former Marine combat veteran who prided himself with stoicism and self-sufficiency. One day while driving from Washington D.C. to Philadelphia I gave up by crying out, “Jesus, if you are who you say you are, here I am. Make me into the person you want me to be, for I am sick and tired of being who I am.” At that moment I started crying like a baby and Marines don’t cry. Although I threw up a contingent prayer I understand now that God was engineering the day of my salvation. From that moment on, my life was drastically changed. My wife and I reconciled by forgiving one another and then dedicated our lives to becoming a disciple of Christ. Although I had made other plans for my life’s work, the Lord was directing my steps at every turn.[i] Eventually, I became a “recovering lawyer” by exchanging law books for the Bible and theological treatises. The Lord loved me enough to give his life for me. What more could I do but dedicate my life to him and serve his Church?



[i] Proverbs 16:9

Proverbial Musings

Those who do not stand for truth will fall for a lie. Those who think they are free thinkers are already slaves to their own fallacies.

Intellect is in the mind of the beholder. Mark Twain once said that he never allowed school to interfere with his education. Many teachers have yet to learn this. Those blinded by their education will eventually fall into the pit of secularization.

One is not truly educated until he knows the difference between truth and bias, but if prejudice colors one's perception, then reality becomes the figment of his imagination.

Those who think highly of themselves have nowhere to go but down. Others think they are on the right road to success, but if they stand pat in their accomplishments, they can still be hit by a passing truck.